Evaluating a Bundled Protocol to Reduce Aspiration Pneumonia in Critically Ill Tube-Fed Patients

Authors

  • Khulood Batarseh Faculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Al Sero Street, Amman 19111, Jordan
  • Mona Abdulhamid Al Nsour Faculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Al Sero Street, Amman 19111, Jordan https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8855-0757
  • Haneen George Zureikat Al-Hussein Medical City, King Abdullah II Street, Amman, Jordan
  • Mohammad Hazza Bani Khaled Faculty of Nursing, Jerash University, Jerash, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-129X

Keywords:

Aspiration pneumonia, Critical care , Bundle protocol , Enteral feeding , Nasogastric tube , Quality improvement

Abstract

Background: Patients who are severely ill and are fed through a nasal tube mostly suffer from aspiration pneumonia. Objective: To evaluate the degree to which an exploratory, evidence-based, and multifaceted method lowered the aspiration pneumonia in critically ill tube-fed patients. Methods: A historical observation group study was carried out by the Critical Care Unit at a tertiary care hospital. For the period of January to December 2021, a control group consisting of 415 individuals got usual care. This group was compared to an experimental group consisting of 2,120 individuals who received additional help for the period of January 2022 to December 2024. As part of the combining method, 30–50 mL of water were flushed after each enteral dose, drugs were given as normal (crushing, decreasing, and flushing between doses), and overnight fasting was strictly limited to six hours. The main effect was incidents of aspiration pneumonia. Results: The intended surgery reduced aspiration pneumonia from 14.7% to 7.8%. After controlling for other factors, the method reduced aspiration pneumonia by 52% (OR=0.48, 95% CI=0.35–0.66). Bundling adherence (≥90%) was linked to decreased incidence (5.2% vs. 13.3% for poor adherence). Reduced median ICU stay (7.0 days vs. 9.0 days) and 22% fewer antibiotic days were noteworthy advantages. Conclusions: Placing forward a cohesive aspiration prevention plan approach led to fewer incidents of aspiration pneumonia and favorable secondary clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who received nutrition by tube. In critical care, this practical procedure assists in making enteral nutrition safer and superior.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkhawaja S, Martin C, Butler RJ, Gwadry-Sridhar F. Post-pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(8):CD008875. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008875.pub2.

Jiyong J, Tiancha H, Huiqin W, Jingfen J. Effect of gastric versus post-pyloric feeding on the incidence of pneumonia in critically ill patients: observations from traditional and Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.07.002.

Deane AM, Guy S, Koopmans R, Page K, Regli A. Routine monitoring of gastric residual volume not recommended. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(1):81-84. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06938-6.

Poulard F, Dimet J, Martin-Lefevre L, Bontemps F, Fiancette M, Lemiale V, et al. Impact of not measuring residual gastric volume in mechanically ventilated patients receiving early enteral feeding: a prospective before-after study. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2010;34(2):125-130. doi: 10.1177/0148607109344745.

McClave SA, Gualdoni J, Nagengast A, Dietsche C, Gott A, Guenter P, et al. Gastric feeding tubes in the critically ill patient. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022;51(4):703-721. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2022.07.004.

Blaser AR, Deane AM, Fruhwald S, van Zanten ARH. Gastrointestinal function in the critically ill: a systematic scoping review and research agenda proposed by the Section of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02937-7.

Boullata JI, Carrera AL, Harvey L, Hudson L, Mays A, McGinnis C, et al. ASPEN safe practices for enteral nutrition therapy. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2017;41(1):15-103. doi: 10.1177/0148607116673053.

Reignier J, Boisramé-Helms J, Brisard L, Lascarrou JB, Ait Hssain A, Anguel N, et al. Enteral versus parenteral early nutrition in ventilated adults with shock: a randomised, controlled, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study (NUTRIREA-2). Lancet. 2018;391(10116):133-143. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32146-3.

Klompas M, Branson R, Cawcutt K, Crist M, Eichenwald EC, Greene LR, et al. Strategies to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-associated events, and nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(6):687-713. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.88.

O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):e162-e193. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257.

Metheny NA, Frantz RA. Head-of-bed elevation in critically ill patients: A review. Crit Care Nurse. 2013;33(4):53-66. doi: 10.4037/ccn2013572.

Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-2732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061115.

Resar R, Pronovost P, Haraden C, Simmonds T, Rainey T, Nolan T. Using a bundle approach to improve ventilator care processes and reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31(5):243-248. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(05)31031-2.

Metheny NA, Davis-Jackson J, Stewart BJ. Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-reduction protocol. Nurs Res. 2010;59(1):18-25. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3ba05.

McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, DiSario JA, Heyland DK, Maloney JP, et al. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: consensus statement. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(6 Suppl):S80-S85. doi: 10.1177/014860710202600612.

Blot SI, Poelaert J, Kollef M. How to avoid microaspiration? A key element for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-92.

Davies AR, Morrison SS, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R, Cooper DJ, Doig GS, et al. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing early nasojejunal with nasogastric nutrition in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(8):2342-2348. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d87e.

Mandell LA, Niederman MS. Aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):651-663. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1714562.

Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8.

Metheny NA, Mills AC, Stewart BJ, Oliver D, Clouse RE. A comprehensive algorithm to detect aspiration in enterally fed critically ill patients. Am J Crit Care. 2021;30(5):371-379. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2021789.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Batarseh, K., Al Nsour, M. A., Zureikat, H. G., & Bani Khaled, M. H. (2026). Evaluating a Bundled Protocol to Reduce Aspiration Pneumonia in Critically Ill Tube-Fed Patients. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ), 10(2), 137–141. Retrieved from https://www.ajms.iq/index.php/ALRAFIDAIN/article/view/2872

Issue

Section

Original article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.