The Difference Between Conventional and Simulation-based BLS Training on Nursing Students’ Knowledge Acquisition and Self-Efficacy in Jordan

Authors

  • Khaldoun Hamdan Faculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
  • Rabia Allari Faculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-346X
  • Ahmad Al-Bashaireh Faculty of Nursing, Philadelphia University, Jarash Road, Amman, Jordan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-1680
  • Muntaha Gharaibeh Faculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v10i2.2867

Keywords:

BLS, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Knowledge , Nursing students , Simulation training , Self-efficacy

Abstract

Background: Advanced technology in education and training is a challenging task that requires appropriate assessment of new, innovative methods. Objective: To evaluate the difference between conventional and simulation-based basic life support (BLS) training on nursing students’ knowledge acquisition and self-efficacy. Methods: A pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was utilized. 87 nursing students (43 in the control and 44 in the intervention groups) were recruited. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, an independent-samples t-test, a paired-samples t-test, Spearman's correlation, ANCOVA, and a multiple linear regression. Results: Significant differences were reported in exam scores between the intervention control groups pre- and post-intervention. Post-intervention exam scores were statistically higher in the simulation group (difference= 2.8), with both groups achieving pass scores. Significant differences between the groups in the total self-efficacy scores for resuscitation were reported. ANCOVA results showed significant differences in exam scores between the two groups (p=0.013), and the intervention had a significantly positive effect on students’ knowledge (7% of the variance in exam scores) (η²=0.07). Conclusions: Students' BLS knowledge and self-efficacy significantly improved after training, regardless of the training method, although simulation-based training showed statistically significant improvement in BLS knowledge acquisition. The modest difference indicates limited educational significance, particularly in the context where conventional training already achieves the competency threshold. Educators and policymakers should consider including simulation-based BLS training in nursing education. However, traditional BLS training is still efficient in improving student knowledge and self-efficacy, especially in limited-resource countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajemba MN, Ikwe C, Iroanya JC. Effectiveness of simulation-based training in medical education: assessing the impact of simulation-based training on clinical skills acquisition and retention: a systematic review. World J Adv Res Rev. 2024;21(1):1833-1843. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.1.0163

Koukourikos K, Tsaloglidou A, Kourkouta L, Papathanasiou IV, Iliadis C, Fratzana A, Panagiotou A. Simulation in clinical nursing education. Acta Inform Med. 2021;29(1):15-20. doi: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20

Kim E. Effect of simulation-based emergency cardiac arrest education on nursing students' self-efficacy and critical thinking skills: Roleplay versus lecture. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;61:258-263. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.003

MacLean H, Janzen KJ, Angus S. Lived experience in simulation: Student perspectives of learning from two lenses. Clin Simul Nurs. 2019;31:1-8. doi: 10.1016/J.ECNS.2019.03.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.004

Lesā R, Daniel B, Harland T. Learning with simulation: The experience of nursing students. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021;56:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.02.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.02.009

Brown AL, Palincsar AS. Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition; In: Knowing, learning, and instruction, Routledge; 2018. p. 393-451. doi: 10.4324/9781315044408-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315044408-13

Alaryani ZD, Alhofaian A, Elhady M. The relationship between knowledge and self-efficacy of nurses regarding early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated defibrillation in Saudi Arabia. Belitung Nurs J. 2021;7(5):387-394. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.1670

Ho SE, Tee SC. Nurses' perceptions of self-efficacy in cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a private hospital in Selangor. Int E-J Sci Med Educ. 2018;12(2). doi: 10.56026/imu.12.2.14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56026/imu.12.2.14

L'Her E, Geeraerts T, Desclefs JP, Benhamou D, Blanié A, Cerf C, et al. Simulation-based teaching in critical care, anaesthesia and emergency medicine. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020;39(2):311-326. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2020.03.010

McInerney N, Nally D, Khan MF, Heneghan H, Cahill RA. Performance effects of simulation training for medical students - a systematic review. GMS J Med Educ. 2022;39(5):Doc51. doi: 10.3205/zma001572.

Partiprajak S, Thongpo P. Retention of basic life support knowledge, self-efficacy and chest compression performance in Thai undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2016;16(1):235-241. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2015.08.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.08.012

Hernández-Padilla JM, Suthers F, Granero-Molina J, Fernández-Sola C. Effects of two retraining strategies on nursing students' acquisition and retention of BLS/AED skills: A cluster randomised trial. Resuscitation. 2015;93:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.05.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.05.008

Srivilaithon W, Amnuaypattanapon K, Limjindaporn C, Diskumpon N, Dasanadeba I, Daorattanachai K. Retention of basic-life-support knowledge and skills in second-year medical students. Open Access Emerg Med. 2020;12:211-217. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S241598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S241598

Hakami AA, Rabie AH, Alzahrani SGM, Alnakhilan FM, Awaidhalharbi K. The impact of simulation education on self-efficacy in pre-registration nursing students. Open J Nurs. 2024;14(1):51-76. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2024.141005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2024.141005

Akhu-Zaheya LM, Gharaibeh MK, Alostaz ZM. Effectiveness of simulation on knowledge acquisition, knowledge retention, and self-efficacy of nursing students in Jordan. Clin Simul Nurs. 2013;9(9):e335-e342. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2012.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2012.05.001

HEAC. Guide for Quality Assurance Criteria for the Nursing and Midwifery Program 2021. Available from: https://en.heac.org.jo/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Nursing-and-Midwifery-Program.pdf.

Sangamesh NC, Vidya KC, Pathi J, Singh A. Awareness, attitude, and knowledge of basic life support among medical, dental, and nursing faculties and students in the university hospital. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(4):161-167. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_240_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_240_17

Vural M, Koşar MF, Kerimoğlu O, Kızkapan F, Kahyaoğlu S, Tuğrul S, İşleyen HB. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge among nursing students: a questionnaire study. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017;17(2):140-145. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7156

Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. National organizations’ priorities for research organizations are to obtain support from the new Scientific Research and Innovation Support Fund 2021 2021. Available from: http://srsf.gov.jo/National-priorities.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918

Roh YS, Issenberg SB, Chung HS, Kim SS. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resuscitation Self-efficacy Scale for nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012;42(7):1079-1086. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2012.42.7.1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.7.1079

IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2016 ed.

Alinier G, Harwood C, Harwood P, Montague S, Huish E, Ruparelia K, et al. Immersive clinical simulation in undergraduate health care interprofessional education: Knowledge and perceptions. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014;10(4):e205-e216. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.12.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.12.006

Mohamed SA, Fashafsheh IH. The effect of simulation-based training on nursing students’ communication skill, self-efficacy and clinical competence for nursing practice. Open J Nurs. 2019;9(08):855. doi: 10.4236/ojn.2019.98064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2019.98064

Park HR, Park JW, Kim CJ, Song JE. Development and validation of simulation teaching strategies in an integrated nursing practicum. Collegian. 2017;24(5):479-486. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2016.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2016.10.007

Roha YS, Lima EJ, Issenberg SB. Effects of an integrated simulation-based resuscitation skills training with clinical practicum on mastery learning and self-efficacy in nursing students. Collegian. 2016;23(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2014.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2014.10.002

Nestel D, Groom J, Eikeland-Husebø S, O'Donnell JM. Simulation for learning and teaching procedural skills: the state of the science. Simul Healthc. 2011;6 Suppl:S10-13. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227ce96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318227ce96

Cecilio-Fernandes D, Brandão CFS, de Oliveira DLC, Fernandes GCVR, Tio RA. Additional simulation training: does it affect students' knowledge acquisition and retention? BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018;5(3):140-143. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000312

Hurd KD, Vlasschaert ME, Hawkins TLA, Haws J, Kupis JN, Ma IW. Effectiveness of simulation-based training for obstetric internal medicine: Impact of cognitive load and emotions on knowledge acquisition and retention. Obstet Med. 2021;14(4):242-247. doi: 10.1177/1753495X211011915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X211011915

Lee J, Lee Y, Lee S, Bae J. Effects of high-fidelity patient simulation led clinical reasoning course: Focused on nursing core competencies, problem solving, and academic self-efficacy. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2016;13(1):20-28. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12080

La Cerra C, Dante A, Caponnetto V, Franconi I, Gaxhja E, Petrucci C, et al. Effects of high-fidelity simulation based on life-threatening clinical condition scenarios on learning outcomes of undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e025306. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025306

Al Gharibi KA, Schmidt N, Arulappan J. Effect of repeated simulation experience on perceived self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;106:105057. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105057

Hung CC, Kao HS, Liu HC, Liang HF, Chu TP, Lee BO. Effects of simulation-based learning on nursing students' perceived competence, self-efficacy, and learning satisfaction: A repeat measurement method. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;97:104725. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104725

Saunders A, Vega MO, Ianelli H, Cross S, Attoe C. Evaluating the impact of simulation-based mental health training on self-efficacy: A retrospective data analysis. Int J Healthc. 2021; 1(1):3-10. doi: 10.54531/XRRK9799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54531/XRRK9799

Mauriz E, Caloca-Amber S, Córdoba-Murga L, Vázquez-Casares AM. Effect of psychophysiological stress and socio-emotional competencies on the clinical performance of nursing students during a simulation practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(10):5448. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105448

Görücü S, Türk G, Karaçam Z. The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making skills: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;140:106270. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106270

Fisher M, Vishwas A, Cross S, Attoe C. Simulation training for police and ambulance services: Improving care for people with mental health needs. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020;6(2):121-122. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000423

Downloads

Published

2026-05-13

How to Cite

Hamdan, K., Allari, R., Al-Bashaireh, A., & Gharaibeh, M. (2026). The Difference Between Conventional and Simulation-based BLS Training on Nursing Students’ Knowledge Acquisition and Self-Efficacy in Jordan. Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ), 10(2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v10i2.2867

Issue

Section

Original article

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.